So, if as you say, the rule is clear and the application to

Lemley was also clear, why do you think we had both our pitching and head coaches ejected for protesting the calls? Obviously, they thought the calls were inappropriate in the context of the game at that point.

In response to this post by AirborneHokie96

Posted: 04/10/2022 at 10:34PM

That ump had a quick thumb and I’m not sure Pete got his money’s worth -- HolidayInnHokie 04/10/2022 9:55PM

Incorrect -- AirborneHokie96 04/10/2022 10:14PM

Asking ump if he can throw somebody out for what he is thinking is ok -- 1980VT 04/11/2022 3:46PM

So, if as you say, the rule is clear and the application to -- hokiepokie 04/10/2022 10:34PM

Because they are biased and want to win -- AirborneHokie96 04/10/2022 10:40PM

Just seems strange that D’Amour see his pitching -- hokiepokie 04/10/2022 11:01PM

The ump might have had rabbit ears -- Hockeydad 04/11/2022 12:28PM

You may be right by the letter, Airborne. But umps always have discretion. -- HolidayInnHokie 04/10/2022 10:20PM

Actually, in high school and college, a lot of discretion is out the window -- AirborneHokie96 04/10/2022 10:31PM

Doug said something about F'in equine excrement ** -- hokieshade 04/10/2022 10:09PM

🐎💩 on a treadmill... ** -- Hokebury 04/11/2022 12:46PM

If THAT is ejectable language, something needs to change. ** -- HolidayInnHokie 04/10/2022 10:16PM

The truth hurts sometimes…….. ** -- RJHokie 04/10/2022 10:12PM

I'm pretty sure when you tell the blue to 'have intercourse' -- HokieNerd 04/10/2022 10:05PM

Agree. But that was only after he was tossed. -- HolidayInnHokie 04/10/2022 10:15PM

Holy wall of text Batman! ** -- HokieNerd 04/10/2022 10:03PM

So, if as you say, the rule is clear and the application to

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors